做勝于言作文600？古人言:“吾嘗終日而思矣,不如須臾之所學(xué)。”現(xiàn)在我說:“終日而言矣,不如須臾之所為。”行動(dòng)起來吧,朋友,拋棄那些大道理,用我們的行動(dòng)創(chuàng)造光明的未來。因?yàn)?行動(dòng),勝于空談。 行動(dòng)比語言更重要高二作文2 當(dāng)下經(jīng)常會(huì)聽到這樣一句話:“不好意思”。這似乎是一句流行語,而且通行在年齡略輕的人群中。那么，做勝于言作文600？一起來了解一下吧。
actions speak louder than words--行勝于言
這是一篇以之為題的演講稿，你提取些句型詞組，形成作文很快的。希望對你有幫助！
The sentiment behind the saying actions speak louder than words is expressed in many cultures. There are certainly references to sayings like it in antiquity, but it may have been first expressed in English in the 1700s. The first reference in English very similar to it is in the book Will and Doom, written by Gersham Bulkeley in 1692, who speaks of actions as “more significant than words.”
The basic idea of Bulkeley’s, which was not new in expression, is that actions speak louder than words as a greater determinant of behavior and character. People can say anything, but when what they say and do are contrary, it’s easier to judge by what is done instead of by what is said. The phrase “saying one thing and doing another,” is related to this idea.
Another way of looking at this old saying, “actions speak louder than words,” is as a guide for how to live life. Actions should meet verbal obligations or sentiments, and they should not contradict them. If a person constantly talks about the plight of the poor but never thinks of donating to a charity or in any way mitigating that plight, their words have a hollowness or empty quality.
Similarly, when people ascribe to certain belief sets, like various religions, that emphasize humility, but then do not act in a humble way, their actions are more telling than their professions of faith. The car with the bumper sticker “What would Jesus Do?” that cuts a person off and drives recklessly is sending a dual and contradictory message. St. Francis noted this in particular when he suggested that people preach the gospel but “use words if necessary.” His idea is that preaching could be active instead of verbal, and that words were secondary to action, and could be expressed in the common phrase, “practice what you preach.”
There is actually legitimate and ongoing scrutiny about whether actions speak louder than words all of the time and in all places. Words are important, and people do listen to them. They don’t always wait to judge whether words are backed up with action, though this might be the wiser course.
Words certainly have the capacity to harm or elevate, and they may sometimes speak louder than actions. Even in ancient Greece, Plato was strongly against the Sophist teaching of rhetoric because it might be used in immoral ways to convince people to think in unethical ways or draw false conclusions. Some of his contemporaries, like Isocrates, stressed that the power of language had to match the power of morality, and that rhetorical language should only be used in an ethical manner. Isocrates also embodied the actions speak louder than words philosophy, and very much used his rhetorical skill to attempt to bring about unification of Greece by frequently writing to Grecian leaders of city-states to plead for this.
In one form of journalism, called “gotcha journalism,” writers and newscasters attempt to catch people either contradicting themselves with other words, or acting in a manner inconsistent with what they’ve said. Gotcha journalism has certainly become easier with the Internet, since people can search anyone’s words and find out if they’ve matched actions, and it’s becoming increasingly common for the average citizen to perform these kinds of searches, especially on politicians or well-known figures in the media. It’s not always known whether actions or words become the determining factor in the popularity of celebrities or politicians; despite actions to the contrary, sometimes words win, and persons not entitled to popularity retain it because of their skill with language or other forms of appeal. It appears Plato’s concern about rhetoric is occasionally justified.
However there is certainly evidence that actions speak than louder than words in a variety of circumstances. The parent who tells a child not to smoke and then lights a cigarette is unlikely to convince that child of the evils of smoking. This has been proven by statistical information showing the greater likelihood of children becoming smokers if their parents smoke. Clearly, in some instances, actions will influence more than words, and though words remain powerful, how people act may mitigate the effects of language, or prove its power.
行動(dòng)往往比言語更具有說服力，當(dāng)一個(gè)人成為說話的巨人，行動(dòng)的矮子時(shí)，即使他說得多么偉大，也難抵達(dá)現(xiàn)實(shí)的彼岸，無法擷取成功的果實(shí)。下面給大家分享一些行動(dòng)比語言更重要高二 作文 ，希望對大家有幫助。
行動(dòng)比語言更重要高二作文1
克雷洛夫說過：“現(xiàn)實(shí)是此岸，理想是彼岸，中間隔著湍急的河流，行動(dòng)則是架在河上的橋梁?！?/p>
面對人生旅途中的急流，似乎每個(gè)人都會(huì)表現(xiàn)得無所畏懼，喊出幾句驚天動(dòng)地的豪言壯語，而真正敢涉足于湍湍急流的人，卻為數(shù)不多。正如花園中的幾個(gè)人，面對著荒蕪蕭條的花園，都會(huì)大發(fā)議論，空談一番。結(jié)果，話說了一火車，事卻沒做成一件。
話說得最多的人，不一定是事做得最多的人。雷聲再大，如果雨點(diǎn)太小，也只是虛張聲勢。實(shí)干才是最真的，行動(dòng)勝于空談。
少空談，多做事，能實(shí)干，能行動(dòng)，是一個(gè)人品質(zhì)、修養(yǎng)的體現(xiàn)。華羅庚說過：“樹老易空，人老易松，科學(xué)之道，我們要誡之以空，誡之以松，我愿一輩子從實(shí)以終。”其實(shí)，何止是科學(xué)之道，做人之道更是如此。腳踏實(shí)地做事，謹(jǐn)慎認(rèn)真為人，這體現(xiàn)的是一個(gè)人的實(shí)干精神，求實(shí)態(tài)度。
雜交水稻之父，面對著盛大的聲譽(yù)，依舊保持著自己踏踏實(shí)實(shí)的實(shí)干作風(fēng)，行走于田壟之間，埋頭于稻浪之中。
戰(zhàn)國時(shí)期，在秦國和趙國之間進(jìn)行的長平之戰(zhàn)中，只會(huì)紙上談兵的趙括直接導(dǎo)致了趙軍的失敗，進(jìn)而還導(dǎo)致了趙國遭受毀滅性打擊，讓秦國國力大幅度超越于同時(shí)代各國，極大地加速了秦國統(tǒng)一中國的進(jìn)程，對歷史造成了很大的影響。這就是紙上談兵的典故。人們常用它來比喻空談理論，不能解決實(shí)際問題；也用它比喻空談不能成為現(xiàn)實(shí)。
談，言也，言如果不能付諸行動(dòng)的話，就永遠(yuǎn)也不能變成現(xiàn)實(shí)。這實(shí)際上就是古人所重視的言行之間的關(guān)系問題——行動(dòng)勝于言語。這也是儒家智慧之一。
不過，長期以來人們卻有一個(gè)偏見，認(rèn)為儒家的讀書人都只是滿口道德文章，手無縛雞之力，只會(huì)空談，不切實(shí)際。可實(shí)際上，儒家對于言和行的關(guān)系的態(tài)度一直以來都很明確?！渡袝分姓f，知道一件事情、一個(gè)道理是很簡單的，但是要把它實(shí)踐起來卻很難?？鬃右卜浅Ｓ憛捒淇淦湔?、說大話的人，他要求人們慎言。他教育自己的學(xué)生說：“我們一定要做到要么不說話，要么一開口說話就切中事物的要害，千萬不要說那些空話、廢話。”他又以大自然的例子來加以說明：“天何言哉？四時(shí)行焉，百物生焉。”意思是說，天說了什么呢？但四季照樣運(yùn)行，萬物照樣生長。
儒家的“行動(dòng)勝于言語”，歸根結(jié)底是一種務(wù)實(shí)的精神，其重點(diǎn)在于行動(dòng)——既然言語本身不能帶來事物的任何變化，就只有用行動(dòng)來做到這一點(diǎn)。
落葉在空中盤旋，譜寫著一曲感恩的樂章，那是大樹對滋養(yǎng)它大地的感恩；白云在蔚藍(lán)的天空中飄蕩，繪畫著那一幅幅感人的畫面，那是白云對哺育它的藍(lán)天的感恩。因?yàn)楦卸鞑艜?huì)有這個(gè)多彩的社會(huì)，因?yàn)楦卸鞑艜?huì)有真摯的友情。因?yàn)楦卸鞑抛屛覀兌昧松恼嬷B ——題記
從嬰兒的“哇哇”墜地到哺育他長大成人，父母們花去了多少的心血與汗水，編織了多少個(gè)日日夜夜；從上小學(xué)到初中，乃至大學(xué)，又有多少老師為他嘔心瀝血，默默奉獻(xiàn)著光和熱，燃燒著自己，點(diǎn)亮著他人。
感恩是發(fā)自內(nèi)心的。俗話說“滴水之恩，當(dāng)涌泉相報(bào)?！备螞r父母，親友為你付出的不僅僅是“一滴水”，而是一片汪洋大海。是否你在父母勞累后遞上一杯暖茶，在他們生日時(shí)遞上一張卡片，在他們失落時(shí)奉上一番問候與安慰，他們往往為我們傾注了心血、精力，而我們又何曾記得他們的生日，體會(huì)他們的勞累，又是否察覺到那縷縷銀絲，那一絲絲皺紋。感恩需要你用心去體會(huì)，去報(bào)答。
感恩是敬重的。居里夫人作為有名的科學(xué)家，曾兩次獲得諾貝爾獎(jiǎng)，但她在會(huì)上看見自己的小學(xué)老師，用一束鮮花表達(dá)她的感激之情；偉人毛澤東也同樣在佳節(jié)送上對老師的一份深深感激。自古以來的偉人無不有著一顆感恩的心，感激不需要驚天動(dòng)地，只需要你的一句問候，一聲呼喚，一絲感慨。
言語需要行動(dòng) 行動(dòng)讓想像的花朵散發(fā)出一陣陣沁人心脾的芳香.——題記 古語云：“狗不以善吠為良,人不以善言為賢.”有好的言語、絕妙的想法,不一定就是有用的,那些都是虛空而不存在.真正對實(shí)際起作用的言語,需要行動(dòng)來實(shí)現(xiàn).沒有行動(dòng),再好的言語都是空想,清朝晚期,太平軍進(jìn)行農(nóng)民起義,當(dāng)時(shí)他們的軍師洪仁軒提出了具有資產(chǎn)階級性質(zhì)的《資政新篇》.這本是一篇大有作為的治國方案,可惜太平軍的首領(lǐng)們沒有將其附于實(shí)現(xiàn),把它放在一邊,讓這篇大作先去了用武之地.最終,他們不能走上資本主義的道路,被清軍攻滅.可嘆資政新案,更痛治策無施.言語離不開行動(dòng).有了行動(dòng),言談與想法便能煥發(fā)出閃閃金芒.阿里巴巴與淘寶網(wǎng)的創(chuàng)始人馬云,便是一位言必行的成功者.當(dāng)二十年前,他看到中國的商業(yè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)幾近空白時(shí),一個(gè)想法在他腦里萌發(fā)：建立屬于自己的網(wǎng)絡(luò)江湖.然而,他不僅說了,同時(shí)也動(dòng)手做了.一點(diǎn)一點(diǎn)的積累,從翻譯社到網(wǎng)營公司再到阿里巴巴,想法與行動(dòng)的結(jié)合讓他一路通天下,成就出“江湖”.試想,沒有行為,只看到光明之路卻不邁步伐,馬云的光明會(huì)到來嗎?行動(dòng)是言語想法的實(shí)行者,通過它,好的言語能變?yōu)楝F(xiàn)實(shí).哪一棟大廈是只憑一張圖紙就建成的?哪一個(gè)美好夢想是只靠想像就有的?人生的道路 ,好的想法是十分重要,但關(guān)鍵還要靠是否費(fèi)心費(fèi)力去做了.古往今來,無數(shù)成功之事讓我們對言與行的關(guān)系理解深入.牛頓看見蘋果掉下來,腦里一動(dòng),立馬去做試驗(yàn),結(jié)果得出了萬有引力定律；易建聯(lián)憑著向NBA進(jìn)軍的夢想,加上每日每夜的籃球場艱辛的汗水,終到達(dá)了美國大陸,成為NBA的一員；無數(shù)學(xué)子們更是懷夢且用功學(xué)習(xí),進(jìn)入了心目中理想的大學(xué)……言必行,行有果,它告訴了我們成功之法.有想法,有行動(dòng),“百二秦關(guān)終屬楚,三千越甲可吞吳”,言行兼?zhèn)浞綖橘t者.言語需要行動(dòng),二者相融,碩果無窮.
以上就是做勝于言作文600的全部內(nèi)容，儒家的“行動(dòng)勝于言語”，歸根結(jié)底是一種務(wù)實(shí)的精神，其重點(diǎn)在于行動(dòng)——既然言語本身不能帶來事物的任何變化，就只有用行動(dòng)來做到這一點(diǎn)?！端臅氛?wù)摓閷W(xué)的幾個(gè)層次，最后一步是“篤行之”，就是強(qiáng)調(diào)實(shí)際行動(dòng)的作用。宋朝陸游寫詩說：“紙上得來終覺淺，絕知此事要躬行”，更加強(qiáng)調(diào)了行動(dòng)的作用。內(nèi)容來源于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)，信息真?zhèn)涡枳孕斜鎰e。如有侵權(quán)請聯(lián)系刪除。
